BY OSITA BIOSE
The recent criticism of the Labour Party representative for the Aniocha/Oshimili federal constituency, Hon. Ngozi Okolie has sparked widespread attention.
While pundits have been swift to condemn Okolie, they have notably remained silent on the performances of representatives from other parties, such as the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the All Progressive Congress (APC). This one-sided scrutiny raises questions about the underlying motives behind the criticism.
It appears that Okolie’s refusal to partake in the unhealthy practice of distributing largesse has made him a target for detractors.
An anonymous critic suggested that the issue is not about Okolie’s ability to attract developmental projects but rather his refusal to “settle” individuals who otherwise claim to have somehow hitherto supported him. Essentially, the critic argues that Okolie should distribute money or “palliatives” to certain individuals.
This expectation is not only detrimental but also a significant obstacle to Nigeria’s progress. It sustains a culture where politicians are viewed as providers of personal benefits rather than public servants committed to societal growth.
The roots of Nigeria’s challenges lie in the deeply ingrained practices of money+ politics and godfatherism.
The demand for politicians to share money or provide handouts perpetuates corruption, encouraging officeholders to prioritise amassing wealth and maintaining their power base over serving the public. Furthermore, it diminishes accountability, shifting focus away from their performance in office to their ability to distribute personal benefits.
As this situation unfolds, Hon. Ngozi Okolie likely feels the burden of these unrealistic expectations. While the pressure may seem overwhelming, it is vital for him to remain steadfast in his mandate to serve the people of Aniocha/Oshimili. Okolie’s primary responsibility is to deliver effective representation, not to act as a dispenser of monetary benefits.
His constituents stand to benefit far more from his efforts to attract meaningful projects, improve infrastructure, and enhance their overall quality of life:before the rxperation of his tenure.
To this end, Okolie is encouraged to stay focused on his goals, engage openly with his constituents, seek alliances with colleagues and stakeholders; and uphold transparency and accountability in all his dealings.
It is imperative that critics ease the unrelenting pressure and allow him the space to work effectively. Persistent destructive and unfair criticism only serves to hinder progress and demoralise leadership.
Okolie’s commitment to transparency and prioritising the needs of his constituency over personal interests is a hopeful sign for Nigeria’s political landscape. By focusing on the greater good, he sets an example that others can emulate. It is crucial for society to acknowledge and reward such leadership, which places collective interests above individual gain.
As a nation, it is time to recalibrate our expectations of politicians. We must prioritise their performance and commitment to public service over the distribution of handouts. By shifting our focus to policies and developmental achievements, we can foster a political culture that values transparency, accountability, constructive criticism and the well-being of all citizens. Only then can we achieve the progress and development we desire for Nigeria.
